↓ Skip to main content

Ab Initio Prediction of Transcription Factor Targets Using Structural Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
6 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ab Initio Prediction of Transcription Factor Targets Using Structural Knowledge
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2005
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tommy Kaplan, Nir Friedman, Hanah Margalit

Abstract

Current approaches for identification and detection of transcription factor binding sites rely on an extensive set of known target genes. Here we describe a novel structure-based approach applicable to transcription factors with no prior binding data. Our approach combines sequence data and structural information to infer context-specific amino acid-nucleotide recognition preferences. These are used to predict binding sites for novel transcription factors from the same structural family. We demonstrate our approach on the Cys(2)His(2) Zinc Finger protein family, and show that the learned DNA-recognition preferences are compatible with experimental results. We use these preferences to perform a genome-wide scan for direct targets of Drosophila melanogaster Cys(2)His(2) transcription factors. By analyzing the predicted targets along with gene annotation and expression data we infer the function and activity of these proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Spain 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 113 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 36%
Researcher 37 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Professor 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 18%
Computer Science 15 12%
Chemistry 4 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 7 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,133,947
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,794
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,095
of 67,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.