You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computerized protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation with scores: usability and validity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/201420140021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cláudia Maria de Felício, Gislaine Aparecida Folha, Alice Stahl Gaido, Márcio de Mendonça Mancine Dantas, Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 16% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,380,628
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#189
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,287
of 227,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.