↓ Skip to main content

Novel Dutch Self-Assessment Biosecurity Toolkit to Identify Biorisk Gaps and to Enhance Biorisk Awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel Dutch Self-Assessment Biosecurity Toolkit to Identify Biorisk Gaps and to Enhance Biorisk Awareness
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00197
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petra C. C. Sijnesael, Linda M. van den Berg, Diederik A. Bleijs, Paul Odinot, Carin de Hoog, Mieke W. J. C. Jansen, Evelien Kampert, Saskia A. Rutjes, Martien Broekhuijsen, Sander Banus

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 33%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,984,409
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#1,843
of 9,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,945
of 259,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#22
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.