You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A pear-derived kairomone with pheromonal potency that attracts male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001140100243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Douglas M. Light, Alan L. Knight, Clive A. Henrick, Dayananda Rajapaska, Bill Lingren, Joseph C. Dickens, Katherine M. Reynolds, Ronald G. Buttery, Gloria Merrill, James Roitman, Bruce C. Campbell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Benin | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 76 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 66% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#817
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,209
of 223,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.