You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating anthropogenic threats to endangered killer whales to inform effective recovery plans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-14471-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert C. Lacy, Rob Williams, Erin Ashe, Kenneth C. Balcomb III, Lauren J. N. Brent, Christopher W. Clark, Darren P. Croft, Deborah A. Giles, Misty MacDuffee, Paul C. Paquet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 283 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 48 | 17% |
| United States | 45 | 16% |
| Canada | 19 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 129 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 227 | 80% |
| Scientists | 41 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 54 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 385. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#81,342
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#1,095
of 142,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,788
of 340,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#41
of 4,697 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,697 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.