You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low interim influenza vaccine effectiveness, Australia, 1 May to 24 September 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Eurosurveillance, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.43.17-00707 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheena G Sullivan, Monique B Chilver, Kylie S Carville, Yi-Mo Deng, Kristina A Grant, Geoff Higgins, Naomi Komadina, Vivian KY Leung, Cara A Minney-Smith, Don Teng, Thomas Tran, Nigel Stocks, James E Fielding |
| Abstract |
In 2017, influenza seasonal activity was high in the southern hemisphere. We present interim influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from Australia. Adjusted VE was low overall at 33% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17 to 46), 50% (95% CI: 8 to 74) for A(H1)pdm09, 10% (95% CI: -16 to 31) for A(H3) and 57% (95% CI: 41 to 69) for influenza B. For A(H3), VE was poorer for those vaccinated in the current and prior seasons. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 17% |
| Australia | 11 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Spain | 6 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 51 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 71% |
| Scientists | 19 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#127,322
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Eurosurveillance
#73
of 3,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,677
of 339,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eurosurveillance
#3
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.