↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent Brain Development and the Risk for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 491)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
515 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adolescent Brain Development and the Risk for Alcohol and Other Drug Problems
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11065-010-9146-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunita Bava, Susan F. Tapert

Abstract

Dynamic changes in neurochemistry, fiber architecture, and tissue composition occur in the adolescent brain. The course of these maturational processes is being charted with greater specificity, owing to advances in neuroimaging and indicate grey matter volume reductions and protracted development of white matter in regions known to support complex cognition and behavior. Though fronto-subcortical circuitry development is notable during adolescence, asynchronous maturation of prefrontal and limbic systems may render youth more vulnerable to risky behaviors such as substance use. Indeed, binge-pattern alcohol consumption and comorbid marijuana use are common among adolescents, and are associated with neural consequences. This review summarizes the unique characteristics of adolescent brain development, particularly aspects that predispose individuals to reward seeking and risky choices during this phase of life, and discusses the influence of substance use on neuromaturation. Together, findings in this arena underscore the importance of refined research and programming efforts in adolescent health and interventional needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 515 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 497 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 85 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 15%
Student > Master 69 13%
Researcher 56 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 8%
Other 84 16%
Unknown 102 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 178 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 12%
Neuroscience 48 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 6%
Social Sciences 24 5%
Other 41 8%
Unknown 129 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#993,940
of 25,238,182 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#32
of 491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,908
of 105,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,238,182 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.