You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mast Fruiting Is a Frequent Strategy in Woody Species of Eastern South America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalia Norden, Jérôme Chave, Pierre Belbenoit, Adeline Caubère, Patrick Châtelet, Pierre-Michel Forget, Christophe Thébaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 135 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 25% |
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 15 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,083,701
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#114,141
of 196,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,790
of 76,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#186
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.