↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): Can we Make it More Clinically Meaningful?

Overview of attention for article published in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): Can we Make it More Clinically Meaningful?
Published in
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.024
Pubmed ID
17478207
Authors

John Patrick Browne, Claire Hopkins, Robert Slack, Stefan J. Cano

Abstract

To test whether subscales should be used when analyzing the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT).

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 25 30%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 58%
Psychology 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,381,794
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#2,777
of 3,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,756
of 326,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
#348
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.