↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004638.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya Bhave Chittawar, Sebastian Franik, Annefloor W Pouwer, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 18%
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 48 25%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 33 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,277,427
of 14,568,967 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,616
of 11,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,448
of 231,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#95
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,568,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.