↓ Skip to main content

Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004638.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priya Bhave Chittawar, Sebastian Franik, Annefloor W Pouwer, Cindy Farquhar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Other 58 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 66%
Unspecified 21 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,037,595
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,115
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,972
of 229,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.