↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Regulatory RNA

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Regulatory RNA'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bioinformatic Discovery of Bacterial Regulatory RNAs Using SIPHT
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 How to Identify CRISPRs in Sequencing Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Strategy for Identifying Noncoding RNAs Using Whole-Genome Tiling Arrays
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Genetic Screens to Identify Bacterial sRNA Regulators
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Competition Assays Using Barcoded Deletion Strains to Gain Insight into Small RNA Function
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Use of Semi-quantitative Northern Blot Analysis to Determine Relative Quantities of Bacterial CRISPR Transcripts
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 RNA Visualization in Bacteria by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 RNA structure prediction: an overview of methods.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Crystallization of RNA–Protein Complexes: From Synthesis and Purification of Individual Components to Crystals
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Analysis of RNA Folding and Ligand Binding by Conventional and High-Throughput Calorimetry
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Use of Aptamer Tagging to Identify In Vivo Protein Binding Partners of Small Regulatory RNAs.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Gel Mobility Shift Assays to Detect Protein-RNA Interactions.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 RNase Footprinting of Protein Binding Sites on an mRNA Target of Small RNAs
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational Identification of sRNA Targets
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Detection of sRNA–mRNA Interactions by Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Activity of Small RNAs on the Stability of Targeted mRNAs In Vivo
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Native Gel Electrophoresis to Study the Binding and Release of RNA Polymerase by 6S RNA
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Ribosome Purification Approaches for Studying Interactions of Regulatory Proteins and RNAs with the Ribosome
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Analysis of Aminoacyl- and Peptidyl-tRNAs by Gel Electrophoresis
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 In Vitro Trans-Translation Assays
Attention for Chapter 12: Gel Mobility Shift Assays to Detect Protein-RNA Interactions.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Gel Mobility Shift Assays to Detect Protein-RNA Interactions.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Bacterial Regulatory RNA
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-949-5_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-948-8, 978-1-61779-949-5
Authors

Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul Babitzke

Abstract

The gel mobility shift assay is a powerful technique for detecting and quantifying protein-RNA interactions. While other techniques such as filter binding and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) are available for quantifying protein-RNA interactions, gel shift analysis provides the added advantage that you can visualize the protein-RNA complexes. In the gel shift assay, protein-RNA complexes are typically separated from the unbound RNA using native polyacrylamide gels in Tris/borate/EDTA buffer, although an alternative Tris-glycine buffering system is superior in many situations. Here, we describe both gel shift methods, along with strategies to improve separation of protein-RNA complexes from free RNA, which can be a particular challenge for small RNA binding proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,691,177
of 22,714,025 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,165
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,381
of 244,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#313
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,714,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.