↓ Skip to main content

Biological relevance of streamflow metrics: regional and national perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Science, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological relevance of streamflow metrics: regional and national perspectives
Published in
Freshwater Science, October 2017
DOI 10.1086/694913
Authors

Daren M. Carlisle, Theodore E. Grantham, Ken Eng, David M. Wolock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 13 27%
Unspecified 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 23%
Unspecified 9 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,055,188
of 12,600,122 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Science
#93
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,715
of 314,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Science
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,600,122 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.