You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What are the impacts of urban agriculture programs on food security in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-3-21 |
| Authors |
Marcel Korth, Ruth Stewart, Laurenz Langer, Nolizwe Madinga, Natalie Rebelo Da Silva, Hazel Zaranyika, Carina van Rooyen, Thea de Wet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 7 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Senegal | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 11% |
| Unknown | 94 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 45 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 21 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 104 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,614,951
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#104
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,320
of 273,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.