You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Streptococcus pneumoniae Carriage Prevalence in Nepal: Evaluation of a Method for Delayed Transport of Samples from Remote Regions and Implications for Vaccine Implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0098739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Hanieh, Mainga Hamaluba, Dominic F. Kelly, Jane A. Metz, Kelly L. Wyres, Roberta Fisher, Rahul Pradhan, Disuja Shakya, Lochan Shrestha, Amrita Shrestha, Anip Joshi, Jocelyn Habens, Bishnu D. Maharjan, Stephen Thorson, Erik Bohler, Ly-Mee Yu, Sarah Kelly, Emma Plested, Tessa John, Anja M. Werno, Neelam Adhikari, David R. Murdoch, Angela B. Brueggemann, Andrew J. Pollard |
| Abstract |
Pneumococcal disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in young children in Nepal, and currently available pneumococcal conjugate vaccines offer moderate coverage of invasive disease isolates. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,241,019
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,339
of 194,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,543
of 228,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,720
of 4,349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.