↓ Skip to main content

Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12294
Authors

Mary Louise Burt, David L. Borchers, Kurt J. Jenkins, Tiago A. Marques

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 1 1%
India 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Latvia 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 54%
Environmental Science 25 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Mathematics 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,990,959
of 15,431,972 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,221
of 1,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,167
of 233,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,431,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.