↓ Skip to main content

Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using mark-recapture distance sampling methods on line transect surveys
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12294
Authors

Mary Louise Burt, David L. Borchers, Kurt J. Jenkins, Tiago A. Marques

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
India 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Latvia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 66%
Environmental Science 17 22%
Unspecified 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,397,120
of 13,600,504 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,082
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,922
of 232,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#30
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.