↓ Skip to main content

The effects of exercise on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer (the UMBRELLA Fit study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of exercise on the quality of life of patients with breast cancer (the UMBRELLA Fit study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2252-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxanne Gal, Evelyn M. Monninkhof, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Carla H. van Gils, Desiree H. J. G. van den Bongard, Petra H. M. Peeters, Helena M. Verkooijen, Anne M. May

Abstract

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that exercise has beneficial effects on quality of life (QoL) in patients with breast cancer. However, these effects were often small. Blinding in an exercise trial is not possible, which has the possible disadvantage of difficult accrual, drop-out after randomization to control and contamination between study groups (controls adopting the behaviour of the intervention group). The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT) is an alternative for conventional RCTs and has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. This cmRCT will be performed within the Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA). Patients with breast cancer who visit the radiotherapy department of the University Medical Center Utrecht are asked to participate in UMBRELLA. Patients give consent for collection of medical information, providing patient-reported outcomes through regular questionnaires and randomization into future intervention studies. Patients who fulfill the UMBRELLA Fit study eligibility criteria (12 to 18 months post inclusion in UMBRELLA, low physical activity level) will be randomly allocated to the intervention or control group (1:1 ratio). Patients randomized to the intervention group will be offered a 12-week exercise programme. The control group will not be informed. Regular cohort measurements will be used for outcome assessment. Feasiblity (including participation, contamination, generalizability and retention) of the cmRCT design and effects of the intervention on QoL will be evaluated. We will examine the feasibility of the cmRCT design in exercise-oncology research and compare this with conventional RCTs. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an exercise intervention on the QoL of patients with breast cancer in the short term (6 months) and long term (24 months) will be studied. Netherlands Trial Register, NTR5482/NL.52062.041.15 . Retrospectively registered on 7 December 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 12%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 16 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 75 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 45 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 19%
Psychology 10 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 87 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,149,214
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,112
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,509
of 342,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them