You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sustainable development of a GCP-compliant clinical trials platform in Africa: the Malaria Clinical Trials Alliance perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-9-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernhards R Ogutu, Rita Baiden, Diadier Diallo, Peter G Smith, Fred N Binka |
| Abstract |
The Malaria Clinical Trials Alliance (MCTA), a programme of INDEPTH network of demographic surveillance centres, was launched in 2006 with two broad objectives: to facilitate the timely development of a network of centres in Africa with the capacity to conduct clinical trials of malaria vaccines and drugs under conditions of good clinical practice (GCP); and to support, strengthen and mentor the centres in the network to facilitate their progression towards self-sustaining clinical research centres. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,241,019
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,314
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,557
of 95,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#37
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.