↓ Skip to main content

Age-Patterns of Malaria Vary with Severity, Transmission Intensity and Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-Patterns of Malaria Vary with Severity, Transmission Intensity and Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilona Carneiro, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer, Jamie T. Griffin, Lucy Smith, Marcel Tanner, Joanna Armstrong Schellenberg, Brian Greenwood, David Schellenberg

Abstract

There is evidence that the age-pattern of Plasmodium falciparum malaria varies with transmission intensity. A better understanding of how this varies with the severity of outcome and across a range of transmission settings could enable locally appropriate targeting of interventions to those most at risk. We have, therefore, undertaken a pooled analysis of existing data from multiple sites to enable a comprehensive overview of the age-patterns of malaria outcomes under different epidemiological conditions in sub-Saharan Africa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
Belgium 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 392 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 17%
Researcher 60 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 71 17%
Unknown 81 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 95 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,762
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,819
of 165,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#343
of 625 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 625 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.