You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Spatial Structure of Stimuli Shapes the Timescale of Correlations in Population Spiking Activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002667 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashok Litwin-Kumar, Maurice J. Chacron, Brent Doiron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,754
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,903
of 187,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#62
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.