You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Influence of Food Texture and Liquid Consistency Modification on Swallowing Physiology and Function: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catriona M. Steele, Woroud Abdulrahman Alsanei, Sona Ayanikalath, Carly E. A. Barbon, Jianshe Chen, Julie A. Y. Cichero, Kim Coutts, Roberto O. Dantas, Janice Duivestein, Lidia Giosa, Ben Hanson, Peter Lam, Caroline Lecko, Chelsea Leigh, Ahmed Nagy, Ashwini M. Namasivayam, Weslania V. Nascimento, Inge Odendaal, Christina H. Smith, Helen Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 8% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 691 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 689 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 107 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 13% |
| Other | 58 | 8% |
| Researcher | 57 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 8% |
| Other | 143 | 21% |
| Unknown | 181 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 174 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 7% |
| Engineering | 20 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 95 | 14% |
| Unknown | 207 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#549,852
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#9
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,602
of 274,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.