You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inducible and multiplex gene regulation using CRISPR–Cpf1-based transcription factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4483 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Y Esther Tak, Benjamin P Kleinstiver, James K Nuñez, Jonathan Y Hsu, Joy E Horng, Jingyi Gong, Jonathan S Weissman, J Keith Joung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 38% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 392 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 24% |
| Researcher | 81 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 148 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Unknown | 90 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,997,740
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,205
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,893
of 343,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#40
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.