↓ Skip to main content

Why don't poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why don't poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption
Published in
Appetite, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Pechey, Pablo Monsivais, Yin-Lam Ng, Theresa M. Marteau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 58 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Other 44 21%
Unknown 70 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,137,880
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#1,571
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,775
of 277,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#34
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.