You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Culture and health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61603-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A David Napier, Clyde Ancarno, Beverley Butler, Joseph Calabrese, Angel Chater, Helen Chatterjee, François Guesnet, Robert Horne, Stephen Jacyna, Sushrut Jadhav, Alison Macdonald, Ulrike Neuendorf, Aaron Parkhurst, Rodney Reynolds, Graham Scambler, Sonu Shamdasani, Sonia Zafer Smith, Jakob Stougaard-Nielsen, Linda Thomson, Nick Tyler, Anna-Maria Volkmann, Trinley Walker, Jessica Watson, Amanda C de C Williams, Chris Willott, James Wilson, Katherine Woolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 135 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 21% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Denmark | 4 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 61% |
| Scientists | 30 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Uganda | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1365 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 233 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 174 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 152 | 11% |
| Researcher | 139 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 69 | 5% |
| Other | 291 | 21% |
| Unknown | 342 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 258 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 222 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 178 | 13% |
| Psychology | 86 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 4% |
| Other | 231 | 17% |
| Unknown | 373 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#161,288
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,982
of 43,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,433
of 275,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#17
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.