↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
590 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 584 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 16%
Student > Bachelor 83 14%
Researcher 53 9%
Student > Postgraduate 48 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Other 122 21%
Unknown 150 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 259 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 55 9%
Unknown 172 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#506,859
of 22,406,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#988
of 12,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,061
of 254,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,406,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.