↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 309 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 18%
Student > Bachelor 50 16%
Researcher 41 13%
Unspecified 36 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 8%
Other 108 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 197 62%
Unspecified 45 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 29 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2019.
All research outputs
#294,345
of 13,194,266 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#805
of 10,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,281
of 232,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,194,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.