The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007482.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona M Smaill, Rosalie M Grivell |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 719 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 713 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 13% |
| Researcher | 59 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 137 | 19% |
| Unknown | 237 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 283 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 60 | 8% |
| Unknown | 265 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#828,742
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,477
of 13,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,808
of 275,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.