You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anti-obesity effect of a traditional Chinese dietary habit—blending lard with vegetable oil while cooking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-017-14704-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji Wang, Sisi Yan, Haisi Xiao, Huijuan Zhou, Shuiping Liu, Yu Zeng, Biying Liu, Rongfang Li, Zhihang Yuan, Jing Wu, Jine Yi, Yarou Bao Sero Razack, Lixin Wen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 30% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,238,835
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#33,749
of 136,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,139
of 335,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,044
of 4,486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.