↓ Skip to main content

Cost of treating inpatient falciparum malaria on the Thai-Myanmar border

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost of treating inpatient falciparum malaria on the Thai-Myanmar border
Published in
Malaria Journal, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-416
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shwe Sin Kyaw, Tom Drake, Ronatrai Ruangveerayuth, Wirongrong Chierakul, Nicholas J White, Paul N Newton, Yoel Lubell

Abstract

Despite demonstrated benefits and World Health Organization (WHO) endorsement, parenteral artesunate is the recommended treatment for patients with severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria in only one fifth of endemic countries. One possible reason for this slow uptake is that a treatment course of parenteral artesunate is costlier than quinine and might, therefore, pose a substantial economic burden to health care systems. This analysis presents a detailed account of the resources used in treating falciparum malaria by either parenteral artesunate or quinine in a hospital on the Thai-Myanmar border.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Cameroon 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,066,090
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,273
of 5,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,088
of 260,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#43
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.