You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of goal-directed fluid therapy based on dynamic parameters on post-surgical outcome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-014-0584-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Benes, Mariateresa Giglio, Nicola Brienza, Frederic Michard |
| Abstract |
Dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness, namely systolic pressure variation, pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and pleth variability index have been shown to be useful to identify in advance patients who will respond to a fluid load by a significant increase in stroke volume and cardiac output. As a result, they are increasingly used to guide fluid therapy. Several randomized controlled trials have tested the ability of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based on dynamic parameters (GDFTdyn) to improve post-surgical outcome. These studies have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to investigate whether the use of GDFTdyn is associated with a decrease in post-surgical morbidity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Greece | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 24% |
| Unknown | 47 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 140 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 61 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,322,655
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,679
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,495
of 274,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#34
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.