You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wind causes Totten Ice Shelf melt and acceleration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.1701681 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chad A. Greene, Donald D. Blankenship, David E. Gwyther, Alessandro Silvano, Esmee van Wijk |
| Abstract |
Totten Glacier in East Antarctica has the potential to raise global sea level by at least 3.5 m, but its sensitivity to climate change has not been well understood. The glacier is coupled to the ocean by the Totten Ice Shelf, which has exhibited variable speed, thickness, and grounding line position in recent years. To understand the drivers of this interannual variability, we compare ice velocity to oceanic wind stress and find a consistent pattern of ice-shelf acceleration 19 months after upwelling anomalies occur at the continental shelf break nearby. The sensitivity to climate forcing we observe is a response to wind-driven redistribution of oceanic heat and is independent of large-scale warming of the atmosphere or ocean. Our results establish a link between the stability of Totten Glacier and upwelling near the East Antarctic coast, where surface winds are projected to intensify over the next century as a result of increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 38% |
| Australia | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Antarctica | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 76% |
| Scientists | 12 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 25% |
| Researcher | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 74 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#194,144
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#1,610
of 12,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,016
of 341,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#31
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.