↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of weak affinity chromatography and surface plasmon resonance in determining affinity of small molecules.

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 736)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of weak affinity chromatography and surface plasmon resonance in determining affinity of small molecules.
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2014.05.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duong-Thi MD, Bergström G, Mandenius CF, Bergström M, Fex T, Ohlson S

Abstract

In this study, we compared affinity data from surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and weak affinity chromatography (WAC), two established techniques for determination of weak affinity (mM-μM) small molecule-protein interactions. In the current comparison, thrombin was used as target protein. In WAC the affinity constant (KD) was determined from retention times, and in SPR it was determined by Langmuir isotherm fitting of steady-state responses. Results indicate a strong correlation between the two methods (R(2)=0.995, P<0.0001).

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Japan 1 6%
Czech Republic 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Chemistry 4 24%
Unspecified 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#531,196
of 4,448,839 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Biochemistry
#25
of 736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,928
of 122,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Biochemistry
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,448,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 736 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.