You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using Molecular Biology to Maximize Concurrent Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-014-0252-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keith Baar |
| Abstract |
Very few sports use only endurance or strength. Outside of running long distances on a flat surface and power-lifting, practically all sports require some combination of endurance and strength. Endurance and strength can be developed simultaneously to some degree. However, the development of a high level of endurance seems to prohibit the development or maintenance of muscle mass and strength. This interaction between endurance and strength is called the concurrent training effect. This review specifically defines the concurrent training effect, discusses the potential molecular mechanisms underlying this effect, and proposes strategies to maximize strength and endurance in the high-level athlete. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 13% |
| Japan | 19 | 8% |
| Spain | 13 | 5% |
| Ireland | 8 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Finland | 4 | 2% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 91 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 169 | 70% |
| Scientists | 45 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 526 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 115 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 12% |
| Other | 40 | 7% |
| Researcher | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 103 | 19% |
| Unknown | 103 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 261 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 7% |
| Unknown | 113 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#220,179
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#202
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,064
of 275,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.