↓ Skip to main content

Macroscopic Response to Microscopic Intrinsic Noise in Three-Dimensional Fisher Fronts

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Macroscopic Response to Microscopic Intrinsic Noise in Three-Dimensional Fisher Fronts
Published in
Physical Review Letters, October 2014
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.113.180602
Authors

S. Nesic, R. Cuerno, E. Moro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 12%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 12 71%
Engineering 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,493,822
of 11,413,569 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#4,970
of 21,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,450
of 209,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#156
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,413,569 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.