↓ Skip to main content

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist-assisted reproductive technology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008046.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Youssef MA, Van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Mochtar MH, Griesinger G, Nagi Mohesen M, Aboulfoutouh I, van Wely M

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ghana 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 19 13%
Other 16 11%
Unspecified 14 10%
Other 48 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 55%
Unspecified 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 18 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,086,862
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,510
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,946
of 228,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.