You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Correction: Inactivation of Norovirus on Dry Copper Alloy Surfaces
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0098333 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
The PLOS ONE Staff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Materials Science | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,184,932
of 24,115,737 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,421
of 207,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,580
of 230,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#847
of 4,621 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,115,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,621 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.