↓ Skip to main content

Allelic mapping bias in RNA-sequencing is not a major confounder in eQTL studies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Allelic mapping bias in RNA-sequencing is not a major confounder in eQTL studies
Published in
Genome Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0467-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikolaos I Panousis, Maria Gutierrez-Arcelus, Emmanouil T Dermitzakis, Tuuli Lappalainen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Brazil 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 111 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 31%
Researcher 38 31%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 24%
Computer Science 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 12 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,463,388
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,485
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,895
of 264,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#77
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.