You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interaction of cyclic ageing at high-rate and low temperatures and safety in lithium-ion batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.135 |
| Authors |
Meike Fleischhammer, Thomas Waldmann, Gunther Bisle, Björn-Ingo Hogg, Margret Wohlfahrt-Mehrens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 28% |
| Researcher | 49 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 90 | 32% |
| Energy | 26 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 25 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 24 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 82 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#3,541,651
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#487
of 9,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,282
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#25
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,670 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.