↓ Skip to main content

Gut microbiota profile in systemic sclerosis patients with and without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal involvement

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut microbiota profile in systemic sclerosis patients with and without clinical evidence of gastrointestinal involvement
Published in
Scientific Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-14889-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vania Patrone, Edoardo Puglisi, Marco Cardinali, Tobias S. Schnitzler, Silvia Svegliati, Antonella Festa, Armando Gabrielli, Lorenzo Morelli

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that there is a link between the gut microbial community and immune-mediated disorders. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by immunonological abnormalities, vascular lesions, and extensive fibrosis. Since the gastrointestinal tract is one of the organs most involved, the goal of this study was to explore the composition of the intestinal microbiota in SSc patients with (SSc/GI+) and without gastrointestinal involvement (SSc/GI-) in comparison to healthy controls (HC). The fecal bacterial composition was investigated by Illumina sequencing of 16 S rRNA gene amplicons. The fecal microbiota of SSc/GI+ subjects was characterized by higher levels of Lactobacillus, Eubacterium and Acinetobacter compared with healthy controls, and lower proportions of Roseburia, Clostridium, and Ruminococcus. The gut microbiota of SSc/GI- subjects was more similar to the microbiota of HC than to that of SSc/GI+ subjects albeit Streptococcus salivarius was over-represented in SSc/GI- fecal samples compared with both SSc/GI+ subjects and controls. Our study reveals microbial signatures of dysbiosis in the gut microbiota of SSc patients that are associated with clinical evidence of gastrointestinal disease. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential role of these perturbations in the onset and progression of systemic sclerosis, and gastrointestinal involvement in particular.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Other 10 15%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,341,373
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#20,481
of 124,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,384
of 329,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#696
of 4,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.