↓ Skip to main content

After Myriad: Genetic Testing in the Wake of Recent Supreme Court Decisions about Gene Patents

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetic Medicine Reports, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 115)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
After Myriad: Genetic Testing in the Wake of Recent Supreme Court Decisions about Gene Patents
Published in
Current Genetic Medicine Reports, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40142-014-0055-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Cook-Deegan, Annie Niehaus

Abstract

Genetic testing is becoming more common and more powerful by the day. The costs of the underlying DNA sequencing technology are plummeting, making it likely that tests based on it will become even more pervasive. The use of tests to determine DNA sequence to help make clinical decisions is here to stay. DNA sequencing is also finding new uses in forensics, determination of ancestry, understanding the history and genetic lineages of human populations and many other applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 5 11%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 14 30%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,182,821
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetic Medicine Reports
#18
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,332
of 238,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetic Medicine Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.