↓ Skip to main content

Circumstantial and toxicological features of deaths from self-administered intravenous anesthetic/narcotic agents

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circumstantial and toxicological features of deaths from self-administered intravenous anesthetic/narcotic agents
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12024-012-9374-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahito Hayashi, Claas Buschmann, Benno Riesselmann, Sonja Roscher, Michael Tsokos

Abstract

For a better understanding of circumstantial and toxicological findings of fatalities resulting from self-administration of intravenous anesthetic/narcotic agents, medico-legal autopsy files of the State Institute of Legal and Social Medicine Berlin from 1998 to 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. Of a total of 15,300 autopsies, 9 cases of such deaths were identified, and all were health care professionals. Medical supplies for injection were found still on, or near, the body at the scene. Anesthetic/narcotic agents detected were classified into 3 categories, and administered solely or in combination. Propofol was the most common agent, being detected in 6 cases. In 2 out of 6 cases, propofol was detected substantially above therapeutic levels and was considered the cause of death. In the remaining 4 cases, propofol levels were within the therapeutic range, but propofol intoxication was considered as lethal due to it being administered by rapid continuous injection. In 5 cases, injection of opioid narcotics was fatal. Alongside the 2 propofol-detected cases, there was one case where a higher-than-therapeutic level of piritramide and a therapeutic level of alfentanil was identified. Despite suspected usage, remifentanil was not detected due to its rapid metabolism by elastases in one case, and sufentanil was undetectable due to putrefaction in another, but death was attributed to their potent respiratory depressant effects without respiratory assistance. Benzodiazepines were detected in 4 cases. All of them were used together with propofol or opioids, and contributed to death by inhibiting respiration. It is essential to consider means of administration as well as additive or synergistic effects of combined agents when interpreting toxicological results in such cases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#679
of 1,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,223
of 172,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.