↓ Skip to main content

Inference for Nonlinear Epidemiological Models Using Genealogies and Time Series

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
228 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inference for Nonlinear Epidemiological Models Using Genealogies and Time Series
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002136
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A. Rasmussen, Oliver Ratmann, Katia Koelle

Abstract

Phylodynamics - the field aiming to quantitatively integrate the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of rapidly evolving populations like those of RNA viruses - increasingly relies upon coalescent approaches to infer past population dynamics from reconstructed genealogies. As sequence data have become more abundant, these approaches are beginning to be used on populations undergoing rapid and rather complex dynamics. In such cases, the simple demographic models that current phylodynamic methods employ can be limiting. First, these models are not ideal for yielding biological insight into the processes that drive the dynamics of the populations of interest. Second, these models differ in form from mechanistic and often stochastic population dynamic models that are currently widely used when fitting models to time series data. As such, their use does not allow for both genealogical data and time series data to be considered in tandem when conducting inference. Here, we present a flexible statistical framework for phylodynamic inference that goes beyond these current limitations. The framework we present employs a recently developed method known as particle MCMC to fit stochastic, nonlinear mechanistic models for complex population dynamics to gene genealogies and time series data in a Bayesian framework. We demonstrate our approach using a nonlinear Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model for the transmission dynamics of an infectious disease and show through simulations that it provides accurate estimates of past disease dynamics and key epidemiological parameters from genealogies with or without accompanying time series data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 228 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 5%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Australia 4 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Vietnam 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 191 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 28%
Researcher 63 28%
Student > Master 25 11%
Professor 14 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 16 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 33%
Mathematics 37 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Computer Science 12 5%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 35 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,011,157
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,282
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,593
of 135,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#67
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.