↓ Skip to main content

Retracing your footsteps: developmental insights to spinal network plasticity following injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retracing your footsteps: developmental insights to spinal network plasticity following injury
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00575.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Jean-Xavier, S. A. Sharples, K. A. Mayr, A. P. Lognon, P. J. Whelan

Abstract

During development of the spinal cord, a precise interaction occurs between descending projections and sensory afferents with spinal networks that lead to expression of coordinated motor output. In the rodent, during the last embryonic week, motor output first occurs as regular bursts of spontaneous activity progressing to stochastic patterns of episodes that express bouts of coordinated rhythmic activity perinatally. Locomotor activity becomes functionally mature in the second postnatal week and is heralded by the onset of weight-bearing locomotion on the 8th-9th postnatal day. Concomitantly there is a maturation of intrinsic properties and key conductances mediating plateau potentials. In this review, we discuss spinal neuronal excitability, descending modulation, and afferent modulation in the developing rodent spinal cord. In the adult, plastic mechanisms are much more constrained but become more permissive following neurotrauma such as spinal cord injury. We discuss parallel mechanisms that contribute to maturation of network function during development to mechanisms of pathological plasticity that contribute to aberrant motor patterns such as spasticity and clonus that emerge following central injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Professor 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,789,745
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4,226
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,818
of 338,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#49
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.