↓ Skip to main content

A hierarchy of ankyrin-spectrin complexes clusters sodium channels at nodes of Ranvier

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A hierarchy of ankyrin-spectrin complexes clusters sodium channels at nodes of Ranvier
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nn.3859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tammy Szu-Yu Ho, Daniel R Zollinger, Kae-Jiun Chang, Mingxuan Xu, Edward C Cooper, Michael C Stankewich, Vann Bennett, Matthew N Rasband

Abstract

The scaffolding protein ankyrin-G is required for Na(+) channel clustering at axon initial segments. It is also considered essential for Na(+) channel clustering at nodes of Ranvier to facilitate fast and efficient action potential propagation. However, notwithstanding these widely accepted roles, we show here that ankyrin-G is dispensable for nodal Na(+) channel clustering in vivo. Unexpectedly, in the absence of ankyrin-G, erythrocyte ankyrin (ankyrin-R) and its binding partner βI spectrin substitute for and rescue nodal Na(+) channel clustering. In addition, channel clustering is also rescued after loss of nodal βIV spectrin by βI spectrin and ankyrin-R. In mice lacking both ankyrin-G and ankyrin-R, Na(+) channels fail to cluster at nodes. Thus, ankyrin R-βI spectrin protein complexes function as secondary reserve Na(+) channel clustering machinery, and two independent ankyrin-spectrin protein complexes exist in myelinated axons to cluster Na(+) channels at nodes of Ranvier.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 31%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 43 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,629,980
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#2,635
of 5,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,363
of 261,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#67
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.