↓ Skip to main content

Video-confidence: a qualitative exploration of videoconferencing for psychiatric emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Video-confidence: a qualitative exploration of videoconferencing for psychiatric emergencies
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0544-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne Vibeke Trondsen, Stein Roald Bolle, Geir Øyvind Stensland, Aksel Tjora

Abstract

BackgroundIn psychiatric emergencies in rural areas the availability of psychiatrists are limited. Therefore, tele-psychiatry, via real-time videoconferencing (VC), has been developed to provide advanced consultative services to areas that lack psychiatrists. However, there is limited research on the use of VC for psychiatric emergencies. The University Hospital of North Norway has been the first hospital in Norway to implement this type of service by developing a new on-call system for psychiatric emergency practice through which psychiatrists are accessible by telephone and VC 24 hours a day for consultations with patients and nurses at three regional psychiatric centres. This study explores patients¿, psychiatrists¿ and nurses¿ experiences of using VC for psychiatric emergencies, as well as how the technology influenced their confidence.MethodsIn this study, we used a qualitative explorative research design. With a particular focus on users¿ experiences of VC, we conducted 29 semi-structured interviews with patients, psychiatrists and nurses who had participated in a VC consultation in at least one psychiatric emergency.ResultsOur findings show that access to the VC system increased the experience of confidence in challenging psychiatric emergencies in four ways: (1) by strengthening patient involvement during the psychiatric specialist¿s assessment, (2) by reducing uncertainty, (3) by sharing responsibility for decisions and (4) by functioning as a safety net even when VC was not used.ConclusionsThis study has demonstrated that an emergency psychiatric service delivered by VC may improve the confidence of psychiatrists, nurses and patients in challenging psychiatric emergencies. VC can serve as an effective tool for ensuring decentralised high-quality psychiatric services for emergency care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Librarian 5 6%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 34 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,068,131
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,344
of 8,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,651
of 266,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#28
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.