Title |
Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella spp. under mono and dual-species conditions and their sensitivity to cetrimonium bromide, peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.08.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maricarmen Iñiguez-Moreno, Melesio Gutiérrez-Lomelí, Pedro Javier Guerrero-Medina, María Guadalupe Avila-Novoa |
Abstract |
The aim of this study was evaluated the biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. under mono and dual-species biofilms, onto stainless steel 316 (SS) and polypropylene B (PP), and their sensitivity to cetrimonium bromide, peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite. The biofilms were developed by immersion of the surfaces in TSB by 10 d at 37°C. The results showed that in monospecies biofilms the type of surface not affected the cellular density (p>0.05). However, in dual-species biofilms on PP the adhesion of Salmonella spp. was favored, 7.61±0.13Log10CFU/cm(2), compared with monospecies biofilms onto the same surface, 5.91±0.44Log10CFU/cm(2) (p<0.05). The mono and dual-species biofilms were subjected to disinfection treatments; and the most effective disinfectant was peracetic acid (3500ppm), reducing by more than 5Log10CFU/cm(2), while the least effective was cetrimonium bromide. In addition, S. aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. were more resistant to the disinfectants in mono than in dual-species biofilms (p<0.05). Therefore, the interspecies interactions between S. aureus 4E and Salmonella spp. had a negative effect on the antimicrobial resistance of each microorganism, compared with the monospecies biofilms. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 9 | 8% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 52 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 65 | 56% |