@TSpives GMO's use 37% less. http://t.co/79wefzSFBm
A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops http://t.co/gBUeQ5nEXi
GM adoption reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68% http://t.co/dlFGqbEal4
#PLOSONE: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops http://t.co/3bqHMe7HuL
@EELV ça na aucune base scientifique à part augmenter une anxiété, ogms C'est au contraire écolo http://t.co/tggrhCJc5o @emmacosse
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
Insecticide usage: http://t.co/rg1Qv5GUaX @NotANumber123 @MGigger @VeggieNinja23 @Joannag1854 @KittenKoder
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
@KittenKoder @Justtweet1505 @LaPalme2 @GMOFreeUSA @Official_SEA16 Also sprayed on organic. Reduced insecticide usage: http://t.co/rg1Qv5Yv2v
#transgenic Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries. http://t.co/LkwRiVqAGp
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
@pcronald @WyoWeeds @kevinfolta This meta-analysis looks useful. Any thoughts on the quality? http://t.co/KgMoeDkZBv Via @AnneGlover_EU
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
@Olivefarmer @toqlip @NewfangledDad @Emilycgb GM tech adoption reduced pesticide use by 37%, increased yields by 22%. http://t.co/s6PBcEYsP8
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
Stor metastudie: GMO har i gjennomsnitt redusert sprøytingen 37%, økt avlingene 22% og økt bøndenes inntekter 68%. http://t.co/vjUWwhRA1F
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
But, one last kick at the cat. A meta-analysis reveals... @FrankNamet http://t.co/1z7rlrAgqi http://t.co/uIQgZn25EO
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
RT @GeoffSchuler: .@Grurray @nntaleb Independent, non industry funded research... http://t.co/4K9OKi3Wa4
.@Grurray @nntaleb Independent, non industry funded research... http://t.co/4K9OKi3Wa4
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
Make it a round 150, Then I'll really believe it. (Those are good numbers though!!) study: http://t.co/WGLxlRugyg https://t.co/kUrsi2otId
*sigh* Here: http://t.co/rg1Qv5Yv2v https://t.co/AJvttP7nFV http://t.co/WzCBwDce30 @nonporkperry @AndreStPierre6 @MGigger
RT @hugofgante: New study on GMOs http://t.co/bDmuASPpIb https://t.co/LeqwtJetKR
New study on GMOs http://t.co/bDmuASPpIb https://t.co/LeqwtJetKR
Thanks to @AnneGlover_EU for reference to earlier tweet on #metanalysis of GM crop trials. @PLOSONE published http://t.co/g11kzdpnUx
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: @bioinformer it was in earlier tweet http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @WvSchaik: 'GM technology in agriculture: -37% chemical pesticide use, +22% crop yields, +68% farmer profits' http://t.co/7BYTAkYz4b
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @zaruk: Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQe…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
@AuntieDote What specifically, is your objection to GMO's? "GM technology has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%" http://t.co/sugWIIwabj
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @zaruk: Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQe…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: @bioinformer it was in earlier tweet http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK
RT @zaruk: Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQe…
RT @zaruk: Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQe…
RT @zaruk: Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQe…
Some more evidence on GMO myths @USRightToKnow Monsanto did not fund this meta-analysis http://t.co/TIO0Tq6uoS https://t.co/1cQeZiVFVN
@bioinformer it was in earlier tweet http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
RT @AnneGlover_EU: Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested…
Evidence for GM impact in peer-reviewed meta-analysis http://t.co/mudCTFKzKK Publicly funded research, authors no vested interests.
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
@SAMonsanto Sources: http://t.co/rg1Qv5Yv2v and https://t.co/AJvttP7nFV and http://t.co/WzCBwDce30 and http://t.co/PxPikXOvif there.
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @prometheusgreen: @MeenaUnity @NYFarmer your opinion is contradicted by data & experience http://t.co/bfcrhCkjCl http://t.co/G2eetGMgKf
@MeenaUnity @NYFarmer your opinion is contradicted by data & experience http://t.co/bfcrhCkjCl http://t.co/G2eetGMgKf
Good news>RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/KyHvXFmmOg
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
@vahuebner @beachvetlbc @kevinfolta meta review on GM safety- http://t.co/NiF2nI8EYu another showing less chemicals- http://t.co/ErOZ3ljO2q
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
RT @thomasforth: Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
Meta-analysis of 147 GMO studies. Pesticides down 37%. Yield up 22%. Farmer profit up 68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
@mrjamesmack @shirkerism @thoughtland it has been shown to improve yields http://t.co/uITDwv2CyE
A Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops #GoldenRice #Greenpeace http://t.co/h5pZNpvJ0j http://t.co/06BmSQ5AT4
@Rafa_Font toma. Leete este que es más completo y no se basa en modelos sino en datos reales. http://t.co/lx6JknmpsT
@johny_doyle @Botanygeek @MaggiMartin_1 I trust the science. http://t.co/yQOdjUrRVH
@johny_doyle @Botanygeek @MaggiMartin_1 I trust the science. http://t.co/yQOdjUrRVH
@hapsci @bellacaledonia this PLOS meta-analysis reports Yields +22%, Pesticides -37%, Farmer profit +68%. http://t.co/6NCW5wVCIm
@McAllister1973 While you're laughing, have a read of this: http://t.co/nYmFR4tfeD
@bellacaledonia @dhothersall @RichardLochhead Your anti-GM sentiment is misguided http://t.co/SyAPxxZCQj http://t.co/czD55tagF7
@RichardLochhead I know you think you're doing the right thing, but GM scaremongering is antiscience and hurts us all http://t.co/czD55tagF7
@bellacaledonia why are you citing literature that's over 10 years old, rather than more recent meta-analysis, e.g http://t.co/vZ7TWnsqzQ
@bellacaledonia why are you citing literature that's over 10 years old, rather than more recent meta-analysis, e.g http://t.co/vZ7TWnsqzQ