A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…

@Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and here https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/nIkN9DNOFv

A thorough new review on the effects of neonicotinoid (nicotine derived) pesticides on animals in general, bees humans in particular: https://t.co/BPGTF9uTY0 Remember, Genetically Engineered BT crops reduce pesticide use, on average by 37% (https://t.co/9

RT @stuartsmyth66: @BestStephen @josephbt Ample evidence refutes the suggestion of environmental and health risks. Health is addressed by a…

@BestStephen @josephbt Ample evidence refutes the suggestion of environmental and health risks. Health is addressed by assessing feed studies of over 100 billion animals. https://t.co/ToBD4DU0Ac Another meta-study quantifies the environmental benefits.

A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie #gmo

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharrat…

Good @CBC story on gene editing. https://t.co/KLI3pLbF0W It's important to correct an erroneous comment by Lucy Sharratt, who said the "biotech industry that has oversold technology...like reduced pesticide use". GM crops reduced pesticide use by 37%. htt

RT @JesseLunsford: @Botanygeek Even ignoring the enjoyable snark surrounding the word "chemicals" -- organic food is grown with pesticides!…

@Botanygeek Even ignoring the enjoyable snark surrounding the word "chemicals" -- organic food is grown with pesticides! It's fine, and safe, but they use chemical pesticides as well. In fact, GMO crops often result in less pesticide use. https://t.co/c

@BestStephen @sideen_dan No, that is what peer reviewed scientific evidence clearly reveals. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd

RT @jmmulet: @DavidECastroG @adiazbedregal @LuisDeStefano @DanielNorero @ErnesBustamante @cientificospe @gorjeda @sofia_valenzuel @bioamara…

@DavidECastroG @adiazbedregal @LuisDeStefano @DanielNorero @ErnesBustamante @cientificospe @gorjeda @sofia_valenzuel @bioamara @minagriperu y el ahorro en insecticidas? No es solo producción, también disminución de coste e impacto ambiental. https://t.co/9

@Botanygeek @lukesmithapps GM is the compromise "pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops" https://t.co/F9xK4ow2PL

@KlausRiede @Agr_Schmidtmann You're quite wrong. Herbicide use has decreased in many countries, while insecticide use has dropped significant. Overall, chemical use is down by 37%. Amazing environmental benefits due to GM crops adoption. https://t.co/o6Ol0

@DrPeterLang @jamt225 @ThiaBallerina so you're a big fan of the kinds of results described here https://t.co/k7GyVQnmMH then rather than those observed here? https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN I prefer my agriculture to be green, sustai

@smithgregory333 @Annealiz1 GM crops have been grown and eaten for 25 years without a single medical health issue. On top of the health benefits, the 25 years of evidence show reduced chemical use, higher yields and increased farmer incomes. https://t.co/o

@_208_ @Bunker_D_ @Matadon_ C'est exact, les faits sont têtus 🤔 → https://t.co/jgvVXYQKBe https://t.co/gGHo71iB1j

@Bunker_D_ @_208_ comme l'ont fait de nombreuses études et méta-analyses : https://t.co/khytLhxGT7 https://t.co/IHjX4M0rup https://t.co/GSPSJNbpk8 https://t.co/Bk4l3MLq0X https://t.co/htCZZPdmwU https://t.co/UbTirxnu3L

RT @jmmulet: @Ximo_ms @DavidECastroG @axjunius @31415_ @equogomez @Equo @gpscongreso @maspais_ y el tuyo es que se mueran de hambre mientra…

@Ximo_ms @DavidECastroG @axjunius @31415_ @equogomez @Equo @gpscongreso @maspais_ y el tuyo es que se mueran de hambre mientras tú salvas el mundo. Por cierto, lo de que los OGM promueven la desigualdad me da que no es así... https://t.co/9MHqKr9aar

RT @prometheusgreen: @helenchristophi the seeds they sell help deliver dramatic reductions to GHG emissions. the more they sell, the better…

RT @prometheusgreen: @helenchristophi the seeds they sell help deliver dramatic reductions to GHG emissions. the more they sell, the better…

@helenchristophi the seeds they sell help deliver dramatic reductions to GHG emissions. the more they sell, the better for the planet. Look. At. The. Data. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN You started out as an objective, critical re

@WyoWeeds @helenchristophi the data are pretty clear https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/rtmDHDI35o

@AdamFMcGregor GMOs increasing yield which means less land usage: https://t.co/74q1QZnpHY Greens can't win. Not slander. You and Greenpeace constantly say GMOs and nuclear power are unsafe.

@laurentozon @marc_rr @BonnetPaul3 @foodevo_lefilm https://t.co/csC7JESXMn https://t.co/3M3EQY849q

@BonnetPaul3 @foodevo_lefilm par exemple https://t.co/Ozp8vJnN2D https://t.co/rEquQDe1UL intéressant aussi https://t.co/OPyH0o3m2g https://t.co/VwJIsp6MKe https://t.co/VwJIsp6MKe

@cj_schroeder @MartinReich5 @ForscherRobert @norwichruesse @SaschaLaubinger @MiriamStaudte @ch_zimmer @GeraldJtb @ebner_sha @GruenMeyer Genauso ist es. Ich bezweifle aber, dass das Ausnutzen von Ängsten vor Biotechnologie der richtige Weg ist, mit solchen

@Lorenz52766229 @MartinReich5 @cj_schroeder @MiriamStaudte @GruenMeyer Zeigt sich das? @MatinQaim kommt da zu anderen Ergebnissen: https://t.co/DedFg9oGv2

RT @ChileBio_AG: @SanEstefan_ @jmmulet @bioamara @sofia_valenzuel @cmartinezf @Vridei_usach @cescept @Agrobio_andina @rodriguezcarina @Peco…

RT @ChileBio_AG: @SanEstefan_ @jmmulet @bioamara @sofia_valenzuel @cmartinezf @Vridei_usach @cescept @Agrobio_andina @rodriguezcarina @Peco…

@Age_Wisely @Teresa_xoxo @BioLayne One of the major reasons farmers use modified crops is to use less chemicals. https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV

@science_et_vie Il n'y a donc absolument aucun déclin... Et puis en 2016 une méta-analyse en Allemagne portant sur des études partout dans le monde montre des gains cette fois ci significatifs. https://t.co/YEhfh88ovP

@mind_working @MASIPAGFarmers humanity must be protected from results like these https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a https://t.co/o7LQPHLwVB https://t.co/7D8ipakmUL

@MontyBoa99 @StormMela @MsActiviss even if that were entirely true (it's not) - so what? study after study after study, for decades, and vast experience has shown "GMOs" are safe. They've made huge positive contributions without harm. Get out of the way.

@bkarmil_ @senkimkarga @chamurbebe @dw_turkce Aslında değil. Tartışma yaratanlar karşı olanlar. Tıpkı Evrim karşıtlığı gibi. Kanıtlar ortaya konulmasına rağmen sürekli bu ispatlanmadı, böyle zarar oldu diye sorun yaratıyorlar. https://t.co/VYgT267EDo Bu ça

@dsquareddigest On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-t

RT @SebastianLakner: @MartinHaeusling Die Literatur zeigt positive Effekte auf den Wohlstand von Betrieben in Entwicklungsländern. Anderers…

Ja total glaubwürdig ! Gentechnik Lobbyist Matin Qain bescheinigt der Gentechnik die Unbedenklichkeit

RT @SebastianLakner: @MartinHaeusling Die Literatur zeigt positive Effekte auf den Wohlstand von Betrieben in Entwicklungsländern. Anderers…

@MartinHaeusling Die Literatur zeigt positive Effekte auf den Wohlstand von Betrieben in Entwicklungsländern. Andererseits fehlen z.B. Belege zu den vermuteten Gesundheitswirkungen. Es geht nicht um „Glaube“, sondern wie gehen wir mit solchen Befunden um?

@AlainPannetier @GMWatch @stuartsmyth66 3/n Going down could be caused by multiple factors. The same is true for US only in the opposite direction. I recommend looking into studies that do some effort to compare at least apples to oranges and not to autom

RT @PetitionE311: @DZBillFulton @KHefferon @HomegrownJoan @Kenn_QBE @Resourceful1942 @stuartsmyth66 @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodsciba…

@DZBillFulton @KHefferon @HomegrownJoan @Kenn_QBE @Resourceful1942 @stuartsmyth66 @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibabe @TaraBarger @OrganicValley @fairlife @USDA @peterdoodes @CFSTrueFood @GMOFreeUSA @reddick_louis @JodiKoberinski @kavn @US_FDA @GovCa

@Simulation_done Evo recimo: https://t.co/mHBeDclIFF @cunnin6 okačio malopre kao komentar na ovaj niz.

@_Tijanizza_ @Meklaud @TitiCammara https://t.co/MFaIJ0uBJP https://t.co/QLQJls0YZc https://t.co/LetJXSsoQW https://t.co/8SVBhSKAD7

@HannaHowe invite him to argue with the data https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a https://t.co/0U92KfImAU

RT @OFABnigeria: #PLOSONE: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/ITsuoIYQmp

#PLOSONE: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops https://t.co/ITsuoIYQmp

https://t.co/ju46Pa3C3o https://t.co/vT7ypvpSjZ

RT @ADNDaniel: @TOLTECATLn @Conacyt_MX 2/3. Acá puedes encontrar un meta análisis sobre los impactos del uso de #OGM en el rendimiento por…

@mnrm_55 @Conacyt_MX 4. No es mi opinión, hay miles de estudios que lo demuestran. Pero como no hay tiempo de leer 10,000 artículos, te dejo 2 meta análisis que se encargan de esta revisión: https://t.co/Zeqi4JOR87, https://t.co/0x6xlzKN6C.

@TOLTECATLn @Conacyt_MX 2/3. Acá puedes encontrar un meta análisis sobre los impactos del uso de #OGM en el rendimiento por hectárea. Una conslusión interesante: las ganancias de los agricultores se incrementaron gracias a los transgénicos... y aún más en

RT @prometheusgreen: @ThousandHillsLG the data and vast practical experience all show your prejudices to be entirely unfounded. https://t.c…

@ThousandHillsLG the data and vast practical experience all show your prejudices to be entirely unfounded. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN https://t.co/03Foc1vgsi

@ARMYmarketing @Forbes_Mexico https://t.co/QAXbQXcKHq

@evlo_inc They reduce pesticides by as much as 37% by this meta analysis in 2014.. (your reference is from 2012) https://t.co/2CCdfaCoJ6

@sunnlife @Erilum_R @Sansdieux Une liste avec d'autres études : https://t.co/qOpXTR51D0

@Eul_Stephane @AccteesContact Les OGM permettent de diminuer les applications de pesticides, d'augmenter les rendements, et d'augmenter les bénéfices de l'agriculteur : https://t.co/zyeTs6m6Gv

@HomegrownJoan @DougJanack @SageThinker99 @robles_jdaniel @uvachemistry @99Only @kavn @Kenn_QBE @Resourceful1942 @spiritstalker @Flwrgirl66x @kenjaques @reddick_louis @NialElkim @nick_saik @AdaptableFarmer Thank you for confirming you have no interest in t

@Hiddemhigh beschuldigt mij van liegen en onzin te te verspreiden; misschien eerst wat meer wetenschappelijke literatuur lezen (en helemaal lezen, zoals @woutervhove aangaf) voor je zo fors uithaalt? Dit is alvast interessant materiaal: https://t.co/NRFvMq

@ecodenker jokt wel meer in zijn stuk, want ook de frase dat gentech het gebruik van pesticiden heeft bestendigd is onzin: https://t.co/AV1lpCZ2FX

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Resourceful1942 @sideen_dan @peterdoodes @LMcLachlan60 @JodiKoberinski @kenjaques @debunkdenialism @HomegrownJoan @trev…

RT @stuartsmyth66: @twitevit @BeyondMeat @usask Thank you for the personal attack, proving you are simply promoting political propaganda. G…

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Resourceful1942 @sideen_dan @peterdoodes @LMcLachlan60 @JodiKoberinski @kenjaques @debunkdenialism @HomegrownJoan @trev…

@twitevit @BeyondMeat @usask Thank you for the personal attack, proving you are simply promoting political propaganda. GM crops have reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%. Always glad to provide facts that refute your propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

@Resourceful1942 @sideen_dan @peterdoodes @LMcLachlan60 @JodiKoberinski @kenjaques @debunkdenialism @HomegrownJoan @trevorcharles @drakekoefoed2 @Santiguazzelli @kavn @edrybicki @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibabe @TaraBarger @OrganicValley @fairlife

@FsuNoles4life @BreitbartNews @mattgaetz "...GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/J09IEirA2b

@Greens4Nuclear Great now if you can just get with the science of GE crop technology and the wonderful things it has done and will do. https://t.co/qBYltljes9

RT @Feulnfernal: @Casquetteahelic @CharlesDepor @scmarco69 Je ne sais pas de quels résultats voulait parler @CharlesDepor, mais les PGM rep…

@GruenMeyer @BauerHolti @norwichruesse @MartinReich5 @SebiVogler @EU_ScienceGeek @phytonaut @kmbirkel @ProgAgrarwende @_grossarth Ja, vielleicht sollte man dann auch andere Studien erwägen, wie diese hier? https://t.co/M0TSzKGUSK

@GruenMeyer @EU_ScienceGeek @norwichruesse @BauerHolti @phytonaut @kmbirkel @MartinReich5 @ProgAgrarwende Vielleicht hierzu auch ein Meta-Studie, die die Effekte der Gentechnik analysiert. Gentechnik kann schon zu höheren Erträgen beitragen. Sie löst nur n

@Olivefarmer @nimeshchandra @dhirajd27 @AgBioWorld @FSANZnews https://t.co/yrTsYsqz6w

@GladerPhilip at what cost???? costs like improvements in yield, sustainability, harvest quality and human health? look at the data. https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FvM74NMYc0 & htt

RT @prometheusgreen: @berationable @MGigger @AgBioWorld @pxwhittle @patrickwhittle @WhittlePM @modern_ag @deralteGaukler @kevinfolta you mi…

@berationable @MGigger @AgBioWorld @pxwhittle @patrickwhittle @WhittlePM @modern_ag @deralteGaukler @kevinfolta you might start here https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 and here https://t.co/By3jtuKH2X. For data see https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AV

@Casquetteahelic @CharlesDepor @scmarco69 Je ne sais pas de quels résultats voulait parler @CharlesDepor, mais les PGM représentent bien une augmentation des récoltes comparées aux techniques conventionnelles (culture sélective, hybridation, mutagenèse) qu

@G_ecolohuman @EmmanuelMacron @dguillaume26 @Elisabeth_Borne @brunepoirson 3 - https://t.co/IHjX4M0rup 4 - https://t.co/Bk4l3MLq0X 5 - https://t.co/htCZZPdmwU 6 - https://t.co/uoUVjxi14v 7 - https://t.co/5wh4Fs0r0Z (non exhaustif) Par ailleurs, les OGM su

@norwichruesse @SaschaLaubinger @GruenMeyer @flaemingslord @Maexchen1 @peter_simone Ja. Aber die Wissenschaft sagt auch, dass Betriebe bei Anwendung von GMO höhere Erträge u Einkommen erzielen können. Dass heißt für mich nicht, dass das entwicklungspolit d

@tomphilpott @Farmerssustain @NYFarmer @ZwartblesIE @systems4food @Kenn_QBE tell us please, Tom, why it is that PG Economics' papers come out in the same place as these folks https://t.co/nc1fMyICku

@Farmerssustain @ZwartblesIE @NYFarmer @systems4food @Kenn_QBE ask and ye shall receive https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a

@Farmerssustain @NYFarmer @ZwartblesIE @systems4food @Kenn_QBE every claim you make there is contradicted by vast amounts of data and wide/deep practical experience. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN &

RT @debunkdenialism: GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https…

RT @debunkdenialism: GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https…

RT @skepteis: @Zirconos @PlantEvolution @ebner_sha @dlfkultur Gentechnik kann einen höheren Ertrag[1] bringen und somit Boden und Wasser sp…

@peter_simone @chrschwaegerl @ebner_sha @dlfkultur https://t.co/K0WXj5v0f9 - auch für Sie, Frau @peter_simone lesenswert.