A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops

@weh_oh @SNoleppa Richtig, das war polemisch überspitzt. Trotzdem meine Frage: Welche Sorten sind aus Sicht von Landwirt*innen vorteilhaft? Pauschal würde ich das nicht beantworten wollen, aber wir können nicht ausschließen, dass es auch Hochleistungsso

@weh_oh Ja. Das mag man politisch als Problem sehen, aber die Vorstellung, dass das allein der wichtigste Grund für Welthunger sei, ist absurd. Abgesehen davon gibt es dazu Belege von @WilhelmKluemper u @MatinQaim, die in eine völlig andere Richtung weisen

@DrScratch @doug20911 @AstroRainbow @emma_ducros Si on regarde un meta-analyse sur l'adoption des OGM, on observe une baisse de 37% des phytosanitaires grâce aux OGM et notamment les OGM Bt (qui se protègent des insectes) https://t.co/csC7JESXMn https://

RT @prometheusgreen: @FarmChicJodi the last 50 years have been marked by massive improvements to farming sustainability and reducing enviro…

@FarmChicJodi the last 50 years have been marked by massive improvements to farming sustainability and reducing environmental impacts, accelerated by the adoption of GM seeds in major commodities. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN https

@thierrytwitch @EksTakumi @MacLesggy @lemondefr @Anses_fr Dans le cadre d'une volonté de baisser la quantité de phytosanitaires, le génie génétique apporte des solutions concrètes qu'on ne peut refuser. C'est le cas avec les OGM transgéniques : https://t

@CKellyBisson It is about the political manipulation of science, which is what eNGOs excel at. It's a tradegy they manipulate science for financial gain, meanwhile developing country farmers suffer needless losses. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd

@Joseph_Garnier @B_Rouille_Idele @emma_ducros @DecodAgri https://t.co/csC7JESXMn Les quantités peuvent augmenter dans le cas des VTH mais au global, il y a réduction. Des remarques dans ce sens ont été faites à @DecodAgri sans que ça soit repris en compt

@NanciGuestRDPhD @CakeNutrition @CommonGroundNow "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV

@TOLTECATLn @Elarmoncru @ElenaBuylla @CiadConacyt @UNAM_MX @jmmulet Pero aunque no pude ver tu meta análisis a ver si te das un tiempito para ver estos https://t.co/UGLnxnKRYC https://t.co/ck7JBh8DzQ

@biosteward GM crops increase yields 22% above conventional. Great to see you call scientists liars. Always pleased to provide facts and evidence that refute propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd

a rant. topic: #nongmo farming. links for additional research: https://t.co/YphYI0iY8S https://t.co/CEAS9L56VW https://t.co/iNjPHw5lGZ https://t.co/RjWjB4pLIu

@rps23r67k @mem_somerville @garyruskin @USRightToKnow @StacyMalkan @usask GM crops increase farmer profitability by 68%. GM crops are a tremendous fiscal benefit for farmers. It's disgusting that groups like USRTK want to reduce farm incomes. https://t.co/

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

Pero para los hippies es malo usar transgenicos, se les chocan las ideas pobres

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

RT @josephmjauregui: Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https:…

Transgénicos: ¿buenos o malos? Metanálisis de 147 papers evaluó impactos agronómicos y económicos de los OGM. https://t.co/1E7pMajNEi Principales conclusiones 🟢21.6% incremento de rinde 🟢36.9% menos cantidad pesticidas 🟢68.2% incremento renta 🔴3.3% inc

@ECongrooo Os melhores estudos indicam que não há malefícios ao meio ambiente e à saúde humana e animal entre as variedades aprovadas e em uso: https://t.co/OU3mbp4t7O

@GoodStuffNW @EvelynKissinge2 @GRAIN_org @careygillam @nickykylegarden There is quite rich scientific literature telling exactly the opposite, eg https://t.co/SvpIF29Vbd . It might be complicated with HT crops because they lead to the replacement of one he

Book marking b/c I can’t remember if I read this before or not https://t.co/Xj692nZnGB

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @KollmarMartin: @MartinHaeusling Hier Resultat einer Meta-Studie: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use…

This is the best of twitter and science. We disagree on something (our perspective, not on facts) and that is not the end of discussion. I am eager to read this paper carefully a few times.

https://t.co/GsaamXmVk6

RT @KollmarMartin: @MartinHaeusling Hier Resultat einer Meta-Studie: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use…

@MartinHaeusling Hier Resultat einer Meta-Studie: "On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Mehr GM-tech, oder? https://t.co/SQvZGlH1Hi

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

Euroopan unioni ampuu itseään jalkaan suhtautuessaan niin nuivasti GM-teknologiaan.

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @AYlhainen: ”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profit…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

”GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries.” https://t.co/55SZDpmC2v

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

RT @stuartsmyth66: Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yiel…

Compared to conventional crops, USDA data shows average organic yield lag of 28% for row crops. Qaim shows GM crops yield 22% more. GM crops yield 69% above organic. The FAO needs to reject agroecology as a food security solution. https://t.co/2FzC8O49ck h

@janetw65 @PieterseMarc Nee hoor. https://t.co/AV1lpCZ2FX

@biosteward Thanks for confirming you reject scientific facts & evidence. Always glad to refute activist propaganda. Organic crops yield one-third less than conventional. GM crops yield 22% above conventional. Easy to tell where the future lies https:/

@louispickletown @HomegrownJoan @Resourceful1942 @kenjaques Thank you for the personal attack. It's always great to see that evidence threatens activist propaganda. Innovations in ag have been beneficial for humans & the environment. Many activists are

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Olivefarmer @ekogaia @cottonfarmgirl @DrPollyBurey @sideen_dan @KHefferon @Resourceful1942 @peterdoodes @PaulRoundy1 @g…

@Olivefarmer @ekogaia @cottonfarmgirl @DrPollyBurey @sideen_dan @KHefferon @Resourceful1942 @peterdoodes @PaulRoundy1 @ganikol @KollmarMartin @muzhinjin @moravec_tomas @Synthon61 @edrybicki @nick_saik @HomegrownJoan @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibab

@Olivefarmer @ekogaia @cottonfarmgirl @DrPollyBurey @sideen_dan @KHefferon @Resourceful1942 @peterdoodes @PaulRoundy1 @ganikol @KollmarMartin @muzhinjin @moravec_tomas @Synthon61 @edrybicki @nick_saik @HomegrownJoan @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibab

@AnkurKaithwas @Greenpeace every bit of the vast amount of data and exerience we have contradicts your claims. no data and no experience supports them. https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/IoftCd

@habichhoa (1/n) Quelques études. Diminution des carbon emissions + diminution des pesticides: https://t.co/oAvPyapnLT + https://t.co/NAZS3Sdyb6. Plus de production pour moins de terrain utilisé = moins de déforestation: https://t.co/v2IQDMl2dF.

RT @stuartsmyth66: @ekogaia @Olivefarmer @Synthon61 @peterdoodes @moravec_tomas @PaulRoundy1 @KollmarMartin @sideen_dan @edrybicki @Resourc…

@ekogaia @Olivefarmer @Synthon61 @peterdoodes @moravec_tomas @PaulRoundy1 @KollmarMartin @sideen_dan @edrybicki @Resourceful1942 @KHefferon @nick_saik @HomegrownJoan @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibabe @TaraBarger @OrganicValley @fairlife @USDA @CFST

@Olivefarmer @KollmarMartin @ekogaia @PaulRoundy1 @sideen_dan @edrybicki @Resourceful1942 @KHefferon @nick_saik @peterdoodes @HomegrownJoan @cybertenchi @robles_jdaniel @foodscibabe @TaraBarger @OrganicValley @fairlife @USDA @CFSTrueFood @adaptablefarmer @

@Eric_OGrey I think @Botanygeek did an analysis of this, but I can’t find it. It’s a lot more complex than organic is more nutritious, and that evidence is weak. Here’s a meta analysis on pesticide conclusions. https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV

@CKellyBisson NAS was looking at risk, not impacts. GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Pretty significant impact. https://t.co/o6Ol0GoELd

@sanzburgo @Jualicra @Mx_Diputados El que afirma tiene la obligación de comprobar, y no con libros, sino con artículos científicos de revistas arbitradas como esté meta análisis de todos los cultivos transgénicos durante 20 años donde se demuestra su inocu

Geçmişe dönük olarak 21 yıllık incelemeye göre, genetiği değiştirilmiş mısır, eşdeğer GDO olmayan mısıra göre, daha toksik ajan içeriyor, daha kaliteli tanelere sahip ve topraktaki canlılara zarar vermiyor. https://t.co/XTpj4WC9Ik https://t.co/23GcfJ1LxT

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Resourceful1942 @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @USRightToKnow Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to farmers…

@Resourceful1942 @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @USRightToKnow Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to farmers being more profitable. GM crops reduce chemical pesticide (37%), increased crop yields (22%), and increased farmer profits (68%). It hel

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Farmerssustain @LMcLachlan60 @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @edgeben @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @prometheusgreen @JoannaBlythm…

RT @CO2ISLIFE_brand: A wonderful breeding technique to overcome environmental constraints. A win win!

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Farmerssustain @LMcLachlan60 @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @edgeben @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @prometheusgreen @JoannaBlythm…

A wonderful breeding technique to overcome environmental constraints. A win win!

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Farmerssustain @LMcLachlan60 @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @edgeben @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @prometheusgreen @JoannaBlythm…

RT @stuartsmyth66: @Farmerssustain @ganikol @prometheusgreen @RippleCreekNW @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @gatesfoundation @EPA @edgeben @pdqbac…

@Farmerssustain @LMcLachlan60 @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @edgeben @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @prometheusgreen @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @gatesfoundation @EPA @BioBeef @AgBioWorld @SimmonsBart @fleroy1974 @GHGGuru @drsplace @twyspy @NaomiStarkman @AustinFrerick

RT @prometheusgreen: @Farmerssustain @stuartsmyth66 @edgeben @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @g…

@Farmerssustain @stuartsmyth66 @edgeben @docmartincohen @pdqbach55 @RippleCreekNW @ganikol @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @gatesfoundation @EPA @BioBeef @AgBioWorld @SimmonsBart @fleroy1974 @GHGGuru @drsplace @twyspy @NaomiStarkman @AustinFrerick you don't need

@Farmerssustain @ganikol @prometheusgreen @RippleCreekNW @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch @gatesfoundation @EPA @edgeben @pdqbach55 @BioBeef @AgBioWorld This is incorrect. GM crops have reduced chemical use by 37%. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF

@12Bly @TeodorBruu @Partiet For det første må du klare å skille mellom MDG og GU før du kritiserer andre for å ikke skille mellom ting. For det andre har du her en metastudie med 147 studier som sier du tar feil: https://t.co/6I5vgnVeuY https://t.co/ImSAz

@FeldonForest @JoannaBlythman @GMWatch vested interests as in organic farmers vs independent think tankers. right. meanwhile, what do the data say? https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FvM

@Olivefarmer @bdowduribe @Stylopidae Thank you for publicly confirming you lie about the benefits of GM crops. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.

@Armanbarret Cuáles serían esos productos? Los GMO tienen 30 años en el mercado y han demostrado ser sumamente seguros para consumo animal y humano. Dejo un meta análisis encargado por el gobierno Alemán. La insulina proviene de e coli GMO, también es mala

@emeowwww @dinis_norm @KenDBerryMD https://t.co/cRoqWvqbnV This study disagrees

@NRItweeter @AgBioWorld @NutritionArtist these may be of interest https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 happy also to answer any questions. have fun!

GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie

RT @stuartsmyth66: @AnnaHar43097943 @Synthon61 @Flwrgirl66x @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @barnoolut @careygillam @SageThinker99 @Kenn_QBE @l…

@AnnaHar43097943 @Synthon61 @Flwrgirl66x @HomegrownJoan @peterdoodes @barnoolut @careygillam @SageThinker99 @Kenn_QBE @lucasnoyes @kevinfolta @cbcwatcher8 @Olivefarmer @kavn @Colin_Todhunter @drakekoefoed2 @kreativekonnect @DavidKucher @Twitlertwit @JodiKo

@Vince_Rookery @MrBissell_917 @AlisonJFraser12 GMO crops generally deliver higher yields on less inputs. what do you call that? https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc

Thanks Robert! I see you like baseball. I do too. Isn't using these broad #GMO crop averages to gauge likely #Bt cotton benefits in #Kenya like using the average MLB batting average to predict whether a particular batter in a particular MLB game will get a

@bdowduribe Two sources https://t.co/Iv0llzZ1VA https://t.co/HYBowfnvWw and Klumper and Qiam 2014 https://t.co/qBYltljes9

RT @prometheusgreen: @Godwin_UQ @RobertWager1 @NonGMOProject peer reviewed data on environmental impacts here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and h…