@tomphilpott @Farmerssustain @NYFarmer @ZwartblesIE @systems4food @Kenn_QBE tell us please, Tom, why it is that PG Economics' papers come out in the same place as these folks https://t.co/nc1fMyICku
@Farmerssustain @ZwartblesIE @NYFarmer @systems4food @Kenn_QBE ask and ye shall receive https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a
@Farmerssustain @NYFarmer @ZwartblesIE @systems4food @Kenn_QBE every claim you make there is contradicted by vast amounts of data and wide/deep practical experience. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/IYeZLMBJ0a & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN &
RT @debunkdenialism: GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https…
RT @debunkdenialism: GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https…
RT @skepteis: @Zirconos @PlantEvolution @ebner_sha @dlfkultur Gentechnik kann einen höheren Ertrag[1] bringen und somit Boden und Wasser sp…
@peter_simone @chrschwaegerl @ebner_sha @dlfkultur https://t.co/K0WXj5v0f9 - auch für Sie, Frau @peter_simone lesenswert.
RT @skepteis: @Zirconos @PlantEvolution @ebner_sha @dlfkultur Gentechnik kann einen höheren Ertrag[1] bringen und somit Boden und Wasser sp…
GM crops have increased farmer profits by 68%. Why do you want to keep farmers poor just so you can oppose GMOs? https://t.co/Bc3fEdpMie
@Zirconos @PlantEvolution @ebner_sha @dlfkultur Gentechnik kann einen höheren Ertrag[1] bringen und somit Boden und Wasser sparen. Es kann zudem der Gebrauch von Pestiziden gesenkt werden einen Teil zur CO2-Reduktion dank GMOs beiträgt.[2] [1] https://t.c
RT @marcusjansen5: @OhneGentechnik @JuliaKloeckner Und hier was zum Lesen - mehr Ertrag, weniger Pestizide, zufriedene Landwirte durch die…
@testbiotech @vonderleyen Bitte lesen - es gibt mehr Vorteile als Risiken. Das sagt nicht "die Industrie" sondern Wissenschaftler einer deutschen Universität https://t.co/OVmnYyuVHR Uni Göttingen: (https://t.co/6MvzeennPT)
@OhneGentechnik @JuliaKloeckner Und hier was zum Lesen - mehr Ertrag, weniger Pestizide, zufriedene Landwirte durch die Anwendung von Gentechnik - warum also weiter Anti-Stimmung machen? https://t.co/OVmnYyuVHR
@scrookson I trust peer reviewed science over the media, chemical use decreased by 37%. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@scrookson Farmers can't replant hybrid seed either, so what is your point? Please provide evidence of organic contamination. Chemical use has dropped by 37% with GM crops, so the dependency point doesn't reflect the market reality. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
RT @RobertWager1: @NorretteM Sorry not quite what history has shown us. https://t.co/qBYltljes9 https://t.co/J5ykQc7GPc
@GMFreeze @bbc5live #GMO regulations "protect" us from horrible outcomes like these... https://t.co/0EYr6hUZHf & https://t.co/tbVUbU1INf & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FvM74NMYc0 https://t.co/LjmPg9tiid
I look forward to seeing your evidence of that claim.
@RobertWager1 Responses: 'Not a meta-analysis' / 'Unscientific study design and flawed conclusions' / 'Flawed Study - Very Terrible.' / Even the ones with a positive title have serious critiques. https://t.co/FtyyphhRfX
@NorretteM Sorry not quite what history has shown us. https://t.co/qBYltljes9 https://t.co/J5ykQc7GPc
@Resourceful1942 @welovegv @zaruk @marcdraco63 @SterlingEricson Thank you for publicly confirming you're opposed to higher yields for farmers, less chemical use and greater household incomes. I'm proud to support food security improvements through science,
RT @DeconinckKoen: @prometheusgreen @OatesBryce @tomphilpott Here are two meta-analyses on impact of GM crops: https://t.co/0KqUOpp2ej and…
@prometheusgreen @OatesBryce @tomphilpott Here are two meta-analyses on impact of GM crops: https://t.co/0KqUOpp2ej and https://t.co/w0XQjaUxRa
@h_odiug @MartinHaeusling Teuer für wen? Bauern steht es frei (sofern erlaubt) GVOs anzubauen. Die, die es tun, profitieren davon: "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits
@Paolo_Bernardi @RheaMillette @business Your arguments are dead. https://t.co/J09IEiJaTJ
@Janerette @marcdraco63 @kewuh @SumOfUs the data show very clearly that crops improved through biotechnology produce more with less enviornmental impactrs and are superior (per unit production) to alternative approaches. See https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & h
@JRLambPhotogra1 @WaterVole Peer reviewed meta analysis showing that, on average, genetically modified crops reduce pesticide use by 37%. That means less non-target impacts on things like bees. https://t.co/U3M84dTQFz
@adambrabant1 @Someguygrego https://t.co/dzatnWFPoy Meta-analysis including the review of 147 studies concluded that GM crops have allowed an average increase in agricultural yield by 22 percent and increased farmers’ profits by 68 percent.
@NOtoGMOs Curious what you think of this paper and the data within? https://t.co/qBYltl1DAB
RT @hjarche: "on average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, & increased farme…
"on average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, & increased farmer profits by 68% ... drawn from information in the analysis of 147 original studies of GM soybean, maize & cotton" https:/
RT @debunkdenialism: @chrlivestock Does not have to be specifically designed to increase yield. Yield increase is an indirect effect of ins…
@chrlivestock Does not have to be specifically designed to increase yield. Yield increase is an indirect effect of insect resistance, for instance. Less damage due to insects equals higher yield. https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a
RT @TimoKuentzle: @weh_oh @bund_net @Bauern_Verband @JuliaKloeckner "Herbizidresistenter Mist, sonst nichts." ist halt schlicht falsch. Wen…
@weh_oh @bund_net @Bauern_Verband @JuliaKloeckner "Herbizidresistenter Mist, sonst nichts." ist halt schlicht falsch. Wenn man die Scheuklappen abnimmt, kann man das auch erkennen: z.B. hier: https://t.co/aGgweIXa3d oder hier: https://t.co/QA1XqcIqdG
@McDonaghDJ @IrishTimesFood @IrishTimes I know. It's depressing for anyone who cares about the environment and climate change. The data show that GMOs reduce exogenous pesticide use by up to 37%, increase crop yields by up to 22%, and increase farm profits
@Marg6102 @nongmoreport do you really think farmers are stupid? that they would willingly pay higher prices for seeds that delivered less? the data show consistent yield superiority of "GM" varieties over alternatives. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https
RT @prometheusgreen: @freud_fjell @mpaola @KHefferon @Prof_GD_Foster This is not a matter of opinion. The data are unambiguous, and those f…
@freud_fjell @mpaola @KHefferon @Prof_GD_Foster This is not a matter of opinion. The data are unambiguous, and those from PG Economics are completely consist with these https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc
@CeeMacBee @Stoves13869 @JoeWStanley @HertsFarmer @mattwridley There's evidence specific GMOs can reduce pesticide use https://t.co/SBgxMRPjfC Such GMOs allow more herbicide use or make toxins, creating new env. risks, <foodplants, poisoning non-target
@mwestall Your problem is with practices in industrial agriculture, not GMOs. https://t.co/YFp4JObEik Farmers increase their profit by 68% from growing GMOs. https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a
RT @debunkdenialism: @nickmlittlejohn Science says you are wrong. https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a Why believe scientific consensus on climate chan…
RT @debunkdenialism: @nickmlittlejohn Science says you are wrong. https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a Why believe scientific consensus on climate chan…
@nickmlittlejohn Science says you are wrong. https://t.co/Fb6iL67Q7a Why believe scientific consensus on climate change and renewable energy, but then not accept it on GMOs? Biased. Popular science video: https://t.co/CVDP2sFoor
@safefoodmatt Why do you oppose an increase in yield? Why do you oppose reductions in chemical use? Why do you oppose increases in farmer profits? GM crops have reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profi
@mik3caprio so you think a mouthpiece for the organic industry that relies on fear based marketing and character assassination is more credible than these peer reviewed papers https://t.co/0EYr6hUZHf & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FvM74NM
@Ivy_Middleton @Veganella_ @GrahamCD62 @_AnimalAdvocate @Williecarroll37 @rspcaassured @RSPCA_official @Protect_Wldlife @Animal_Watch @PeterEgan6 @RobRobbEdwards @ARCrusade @Animals1st @vegannutrition1 Wouldn't it be great to find a way to reduce CO2 emiss
RT @maha_mabic: Time to switch from food aid to innovation aid to help developing countries. Research in Germany shows how GM crop adoption…
@MoyHdez2 Este mismo. https://t.co/9MHqKr9aar
RT @maha_mabic: Time to switch from food aid to innovation aid to help developing countries. Research in Germany shows how GM crop adoption…
Time to switch from food aid to innovation aid to help developing countries. Research in Germany shows how GM crop adoption in developing nations has increased crop yields by 14% more than in developed nations, especially among smallholder farmers. https:
RT @MartinThuer: Zur Frage der Studienlage zu grüner Gentechnik, sei etwa angemerkt, das ist schon sehr gut erforscht mittlerweile. Siehe z…
Zur Frage der Studienlage zu grüner Gentechnik, sei etwa angemerkt, das ist schon sehr gut erforscht mittlerweile. Siehe zB https://t.co/kBBP7CEZvh
@Rail4Eva "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." It's great how GM crops have contributed to keeping food prices lower due to higher production. https://t.co/o6
RT @XiXiDu: Genetically modified plants (GMOs) have on average reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and inc…
Genetically modified plants (GMOs) have on average reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. https://t.co/l7KknQZPI1 Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in develope
@Kikasitsu @JoAshnest Evidence is quite different. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." Higher farmer profits a great advantage of GM crops, not to mention im
@GreenpeaceMiami @kenrussellmiami @MiamiWaterkpr @MiamiNewTimes @UNEnvironment @greenpeaceusa @GreenpeaceEU @FranziskaAb @ReyesEcoFarming The production of GM crops is the most sustainable form of crop production presently utilized to produce crops, as GM
@tauss @RegineBY @phytonaut @gj_lsa @Die_Gruenen @Bayer Gut, dann beginnen Sie mal damit, diese übersichtliche Übersichtsstudie zu lesen: https://t.co/T4rPcqDVKB Ergebnis in kurz: Weniger Pflanzenschutzmittel, mehr Erträge durch #Gentechnik.
@ScottRobert1959 @agritof80 @yjadot @Europe1 C'est faux: https://t.co/oTeTKxfZGI Les OGMs permettent de diminuer l'utilisation de pesticides.
@fr_ajena La mutagénèse est OGM et ça fait bientôt 90 ans qu'on en cultive. Les OGM ont des impacts économiques, sociétaux et environnementaux positifs. Par ex : https://t.co/uikfnCt6K5 Ou : https://t.co/UbTirxnu3L Ou : https://t.co/htCZZPdmwU Ou : htt
@agritof80 @Utopia_Rabbit @saprinti @genefutures Quelques autres refs sur le sujet https://t.co/0StBIjBArE https://t.co/Ozp8vJnN2D https://t.co/7DGFhqjHvc https://t.co/0YjkRoYhwH https://t.co/cR1dzvmFdn
@DrPrerogative @areyounair for info on environmental & economic impacts see https://t.co/m8HJMfRr24 the best meta analysis of impacts here https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc the best data on how rapidly farmers have adopted "GMO" seeds here https://t.co/vl05qTJnS
@JSegor @wsscherk @realdeepdives @ScottAdamsSays @geoffmprice @luvkit Re: "move right on to GMOs" Some useful places to start: https://t.co/s4gQ4Kcjwx https://t.co/R47GyposPs https://t.co/oe37f2KrBN https://t.co/o1spiTLDrU https://t.co/rDk6L02f4t https:/
@GarrettBroad @SavorTooth @JaffeGregory @CSPI @GESCenterNCSU @theNASEM @PlntTransformer @ArthurCaplan Why do you say they are overrated on yield? 22% seems properly-rated to me. https://t.co/znZb2rvMsj
RT @JamesPBLloyd: @Qomo20 @SciShowTangents This is a really important question. Hopefully they answer it. Briefly, GMOs have reduced pest…