@PodiTalk @ruckingfad @miss_levant @GhotixHook @MakeItRayn_ It's not double yields, but it's 22% yield increase, which is significant. https://t.co/ZhBiOtCdEA
@flutemanrich Sorry, more propaganda, GM crops use less chemicals. "GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%." https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@DrTomEllis yep, and to add some stats here: 1st gen GM crops alone (that while genetically engineered were/are far from the synbio ideal) raised yields by 22% (think land-use) and reduced chemical pesticide use (think biodiversity) by 37%. https://t.co/z
RT @stuartsmyth66: Thanks for the personal attack, proving that you spread propaganda and have nothing credible to contribute. GM crop bene…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Thanks for the personal attack, proving that you spread propaganda and have nothing credible to contribute. GM crop bene…
RT @stuartsmyth66: Thanks for the personal attack, proving that you spread propaganda and have nothing credible to contribute. GM crop bene…
Thanks for the personal attack, proving that you spread propaganda and have nothing credible to contribute. GM crop benefits include reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Clear benefits. h
@NikSense8 @KHefferon @GMWatch Thanks for publicly confirming you're opposed to the benefits of GM crops that include: reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@luis_ag2254 @SergioSarmiento Tu argumento es poco claro, pero te lo doy por válido, revisa este: https://t.co/k9F8M3AULx o este https://t.co/EhnIHK2i6t
@RobGMacfarlane to the extent this paper describes a real phenomenon, it flags habitat loss as one major driver of insect decline. habitat loss is most easily stemmed by improving ag productivity, esp by using more sustainable biotech innovations in ag lik
RT @stuartsmyth66: @twitevit @foe_us They most certainly are by growing GM crops, through reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased…
RT @stuartsmyth66: @twitevit @foe_us They most certainly are by growing GM crops, through reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased…
@GENINPATRICK2 @FusalbaThierry @Jiemb1 @PicocheD @SmoothHeadGuy @NR_Tours @caritasfrance @ccfd_tsolidaire @oxfamfrance 2/ Et du riz dorée en Inde: https://t.co/DxP0kAvH6w ayant causé https://t.co/hRuL8Dn9wQ Plus une étude étude qui analyse l'impact des ogm
@mrdiogon @ArnaudGrosbois @agritof80 @simardcasanova @Annette_LEXA @Damkyan_Omega https://t.co/90Ybh1XQQj Une meta-analyse selon laquelle l'utilisation d'OGM aurait permis de diminuer les qtés de pesticides utilisées de 37%
@GMFreeze because the last thing in the world we want is safe food at lower cost produced in a more sustainable manner, amiright? (spoiler alert: maybe y'all might want to have a look at the data and re-think this) https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/ZXD
@CoryBooker Senator, both data and experience show that with respect to "GMOs" those concerns are completely misplaced, and reality is 180 degrees opposite the common perception https://t.co/0EYr6hUZHf & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc https://t.co/8ipEhFbB
RT @prometheusgreen: @harshkn @varmabhi @DeshpandePradep @manujosephsan trusting a naif far outside his area of competence is less reliable…
@harshkn @varmabhi @DeshpandePradep @manujosephsan trusting a naif far outside his area of competence is less reliable than consulting data and vast real world experience sampled here https://t.co/bfcrhCkjCl … & https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az … & https://
@harshkn @varmabhi @DeshpandePradep @manujosephsan how much data do you need? https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az & https://t.co/Oid5xsdEjl & https://t.co/hvlUj5p0y1 & https://t.co/PwYgZsIC6s claiming that we don't know when
@GMOFreeEU fortunately the EC credits scientific data more than mythmongering https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9 https://t.co/CJtYC5sA4j
@jamesbroadway Nope, a research chair, one of over 100 at U Sask. GM crops raise yields by 22%, enhancing food security. Great technology for food insecure nations to adopt. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@Actionfortime @DanielNorero @AgBioWorld @kevinfolta @JonEntine @ScienceAlly @Sarah_Evanega @RobbFraley @Pvincell @franknfoode so, selling farmers improved seeds that cut their input costs while increasing sustainability and profitability is a bad thing. h
@BlancaRuibal La mayor revisión de impacto de GMO (https://t.co/ERz5I7INm5) hasta la fecha no dice eso.El uso de pesticidas se mantiene igual en HR al no HR(un ascenso no significativo del 2%) mientras que los IR reduce el consumo de pesticidas un 41% y si
@TimothyAWise @DavidKucher @SageThinker99 @JodiKoberinski @DrLizaMD @Olivefarmer @HomegrownJoan @robles_jdaniel @DrHallba @kevinfolta @GMWatch @GMOFreeUSA @nntaleb @Jack_Heinemann @garyruskin @AlainPannetier @normonics You mean all evidence, substantial be
@RegidSteel42816 @GMWatch @Elizabethecolog I wonder what the data show.... https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/FC7thy0xhl https://t.co/OxN7miQVSd
@emilholmcph @kristianleth Ældre meta-analyse viser øget udbytte, mere profit og mindre pesticidforbrug: https://t.co/JUzvbcc1dv. Og en meget lang EU-rapport: https://t.co/9BPL60cEjM.
RT @AJStein_de: @PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers…
RT @AJStein_de: @PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers…
@PeterSinger While less than would be possible without green opposition, #GMO crops can and do already benefit poor farmers in developing countries, see e.g.: https://t.co/dFC9LLRZnH ; https://t.co/I9c0z0eVyy ; https://t.co/rG2Oiye8pR ; https://t.co/ypnokB
@GMWatch History shows & peer reviewed papers confirm that farmers choices have expanded with the introduction of "GM" seeds while increasing profitability & dramatically decreasing the environmental impacts of agriculture https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc s
@phytonaut @ForscherRobert Warum so angriffig, wenn sich unsere Ziele doch decken? Ich argumentiere nur auf Basis von wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis, wie z.B. diese Meta-Studie: https://t.co/T4rPcqDVKB
Herzlichen Glückwunsch! https://t.co/OKLp2EZBbW
Una lástima que la @UMSAlamejor @informacionumsa a través del canal universitario se preste a propagar mentiras e ignorancia, en la voz de @WolfgangKellert, esta vez sobre cultivos transgénicos cuya seguridad ha sido demostrada hasta el cansancio: https://
RT @nobody_absolute: @tonodearuK @SHIMAQ404 @mikekhim5 GM植物は農薬を効率的使用可能な点で、農薬使用料を減少させ(メタ解析↓)、環境汚染度は下がります https://t.co/X442l2vg3S GM植物の環境への影…
@tonodearuK @SHIMAQ404 @mikekhim5 GM植物は農薬を効率的使用可能な点で、農薬使用料を減少させ(メタ解析↓)、環境汚染度は下がります https://t.co/X442l2vg3S GM植物の環境への影響で懸念されるのは野生化での交雑です 各機関の懸念事項ですので厳重に精査されます 不適格だと不認可、認可GM植物もガイドラインに添う必要がありますよ
@TamarHaspel @qz and since data and experience verify overwhelmingly that "GM" crops are at least as safe and sustainable as any others, and better in many regards... https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/L29dpOhK0w & https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN &
@njz0428 @stuartsmyth66 https://t.co/Z0ppLRLMWK Try reading this one.
@GaythiaWeis @dropeik The data, in fact, do not support this claim. https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc
@CharlesCMann @billmckibben This must also come as a surprise to farmers in India and elsewhere, who have adopted Bt cotton in droves - with reduced insecticide use and higher profits as a result. See e.g. this meta-analysis: https://t.co/XbhONKnOIx
@AgBioWorld @_Uirapuru @rohit2691 @jpsportsminer @msswaminathan @fssaiindia @ceo_fssai @GMWatch Indeed. It's interesting how the SCTEC managed to miss this https://t.co/W8NLkWrs4H and this https://t.co/mhIfPW3AaQ and this https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az and this
@GMOFreeUSA @giggerwhat @Eamon4prez @RachelsNews @usask Once again, thanks for the personal attack, sowing yet again that you're unable to offer anything that is factual evidence to refute scientific evidence such as this about the global benefits of GM cr
@_Uirapuru @jpsportsminer @AgBioWorld 2/2 and also here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and here https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc and here https://t.co/L29dpOhK0w. An excellent summary for the general public can be found here https://t.co/mOZCPlzMN9
RT @Figurwechsel: A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops Genetically improved crops reduce pesticide use by 37%, boo…
A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops Genetically improved crops reduce pesticide use by 37%, boost crop yields by 22% and increase farmer profits by 68%. https://t.co/WbjgddEqoZ
On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops.
@sandrasandraphd @gmopundit @TamarHaspel @DavidKucher all experience has shown crops improved through biotechnology ("GMOs") to be as safe as, or safer than, alternatives. The data are unambiguous and massive. https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az https://t.co/XEJZxGiCB
@sandrasandraphd @DavidKucher @TamarHaspel there's actually a considerable body of data and experience showing biotech improved crops deliver substantial sustainability, environment & safety benefits https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVV
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
RT @prometheusgreen: @TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGa…
@TerryDaynard the only thing @Greenpeace knows about agricultural sustainability is how to oppose it https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc; this is relevant https://t.co/sIZbCmZHlw
@chasqg @JonathanPlaid @tweet_your_MP leading European scientists explain why the ECJ got it wrong here https://t.co/vZBZ5dpatL some relevant information here https://t.co/FC7thy0xhl here https://t.co/lGSfrLJAoY here https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN and here https
@des_science @OGMPourTous @DioCyni @genefutures "Jusque là les biotech n'ont rien donné" https://t.co/htCZZPdmwU Sinon beau sophisme, même si les OGM n'avaient rien donné aujourd'hui ça ne veut pas dire qu'ils ne peuvent pas apporter quelque chose. https:
@NonGMOProject you have a curious definition of "disaster" https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/tbVUbU1INf & https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az https://t.co/5ar9hHJeW8
@GMWatch Antoniou has been saying things like this for the last three decades. talk to the results, Michael. https://t.co/ZlGah8AVtN & https://t.co/ieCR1WvVVc & https://t.co/AGzjhLD1Az https://t.co/k3uM43MNDp
@freeagain1970 @pewresearch Actually it decreases it, even if you consider ht crops https://t.co/VaDnwWBboZ
RT @schillipaeppa: @reticularis @peter_simone @fdp Weil die Menschen schlecht informiert sind: https://t.co/AS92HcQKDc "Es kann nicht die…
RT @schillipaeppa: @reticularis @peter_simone @fdp Weil die Menschen schlecht informiert sind: https://t.co/AS92HcQKDc "Es kann nicht die…
@reticularis @peter_simone @fdp Weil die Menschen schlecht informiert sind: https://t.co/AS92HcQKDc "Es kann nicht die Aufgabe eines Politikers sein, die öffentliche Meinung abzuklopfen und dann das Populäre zu tun. Aufgabe des Politikers ist es, das Rich
@deheij @JohnVos1971 @HendrikKaput @gravenweg14a Gm is geen valse belofte. https://t.co/AV1lpCZ2FX een beetje wetenschapshistoricus weet dat er legio succesvolle innovaties zijn, zoals hybrids.
@GMOFreeIllinois @JodiKoberinski @trevorcharles @Timberati @MESO_S_H @TomahawkVPhD @RobbFraley @FarmFoodCare @FoodIntegrityCA @ArrellFoodInst @aggiecoolchick @Jack_Heinemann @SciReports @IPESfood Everything you mention is not supported with peer reviewed s
@norwichruesse @flaemingslord @EinguterMerlot @lingenhoehl @ReskiLab @PlantEvolution @RenateKuenast @SPIEGELONLINE Diese Studie von Herrn Qaim <https://t.co/0PDw6PESJW> ist eine von vielen die das sehr schön belegt. Vorteile insbesondere in der Subsi
@norwichruesse @flaemingslord @EinguterMerlot @lingenhoehl @ReskiLab @PlantEvolution @RenateKuenast @SPIEGELONLINE https://t.co/NR4rO5ZDtV Der PSM Einsatz sinkt. Schon x-mal geposted. Und zu Genome Editing: Die ersten gesünderen Weizen- und Sojasorten st
@WilhelmKluemper & Qaim (@uniGoettingen) 2004 “On average, #GMO has reduced ... pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, & increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield & profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed cou
@KrlitoBrigante @Moriarty909 En promedio se reduce el uso de pesticidas en 37% e incrementa la productividad en 22% y los ingresos de los agricultores en 68% https://t.co/r8ptLdnyXg
@magoindignadode @pablocasado Mira que me cae mal el facha de pablo casado, pero peor me caen los ignorantes como tú https://t.co/9eKyM3jf9U
@TOLTECATLn @vicfc7 @kcedano @daniela_oaks @elnocturno Glifosato y cáncer: https://t.co/pbJYqgrLSL GMO (incluye los resistentes a herbicida): https://t.co/uZ9EU8Cd3b
@Camastan @JH_Camacho_Vera Falso. Los estudios demuestran aumentos en productividad de hasta el 22% https://t.co/ZTIssirxIm
@farminpete @KittyAmnezia @marcdraco63 GM crops reduce chemical use by 37%. It's great that science provide facts and evidence to refute eNGO propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
@farminpete Sorry, it's the big organic/big tobacco strategy that rejects scientific evidence of the environmental benefits of GM crops and chemical use. Great to see that science is able to dismiss eNGO propaganda. https://t.co/o6Ol0G73TF
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
Ahí se las dejo...
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…
RT @alexisrebdo: La adopción de transgénicos redujo uso de pesticidas en un 37%, aumentó rendimiento de cultivos en un 22% y aumentó gananc…