You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rescuing Collective Wisdom when the Average Group Opinion Is Wrong
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2017.00056 |
| Authors |
Andres Laan, Gabriel Madirolas, Gonzalo G. de Polavieja |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 22% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| Portugal | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 50% |
| Scientists | 15 | 47% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 27% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,189,271
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#83
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,171
of 345,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.