↓ Skip to main content

Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011142.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikki van Dessel, Madelon den Boeft, Johannes C van der Wouden, Maria Kleinstäuber, Stephanie S Leone, Berend Terluin, Mattijs E Numans, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Harm van Marwijk

Abstract

Medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) are physical symptoms for which no adequate medical explanation can be found after proper examination. The presence of MUPS is the key feature of conditions known as 'somatoform disorders'. Various psychological and physical therapies have been developed to treat somatoform disorders and MUPS. Although there are several reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and MUPS, a complete overview of the whole spectrum is missing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 122%
Unspecified 6 67%
Researcher 5 56%
Student > Bachelor 4 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Other 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 89%
Social Sciences 7 78%
Psychology 7 78%
Unspecified 6 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Other 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#387,645
of 13,696,978 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,098
of 10,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,914
of 233,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,696,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.