You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Counselling versus Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for persistent sub-threshold and mild Depression (CLICD): study protocol for a pilot/feasibility randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
SpringerPlus, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2193-1801-3-654 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Freire, Jill Morrison, Christopher Williams, Mick Cooper, Robert Elliott, Alex McConnachie, Andrew Walker, Deborah Heard |
Abstract |
Persistent sub-threshold depressive symptoms are important because almost all patients who experience symptoms for more than 2 years go on to develop major depressive episodes. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the United Kingdom recommends research into the efficacy of person centred counselling and low-intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for persistent sub-threshold and mild depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 16 | 44% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,220,642
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#354
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,031
of 264,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#23
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.